After raising the issue of the low resolution problem of the timer provided by clock()
in Resolution Problems in clock()
, I’ve ended the post by mentioning to two more functions that should provide high-resolution timers suitable for profiling code. In this post I will discuss one of them, clock_gettime()
.
The clock_gettime()
provides access to several useful timers with the resolution of nanoseconds. First, the prototype for the function is as follows:
int clock_gettime(clockid_t clk_id, struct timespect *tp);
The clk_id
allows us to select a specific clock from the several
offered by the system, which includes:
-
CLOCK_REALTIME
, a system-wide realtime clock. -
CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID
, high-resolution timer provided by the CPU for each process. -
CLOCK_THREAD_CPUTIME_ID
, high-resolution timer provided by the CPU for each of the threads.
Usually, there are more clocks provided, but I find these three the most useful as they allow to get the execution time spent in the system level, process level and the thread level.
The current clock time, for the chosen clock is stored int the struct provided by the *tp
pointer. The timespec
struct is defined as follows:
struct timespec {
time_t tv_sec; /* seconds */
long tv_nsec; /* nanoseconds */
};
To time the processing time some function took, one should call clock_gettime()
twice. Once before the function call and once right after it and subtract the returned timings to get the actual runtime.
Getting the difference between two timespec structs isn’t very complicated and can be acheived using the function diff()
defined bellow:
timespec diff(timespec start, timespec end)
{
timespec temp;
if ((end.tv_nsec-start.tv_nsec)<0) {
temp.tv_sec = end.tv_sec-start.tv_sec-1;
temp.tv_nsec = 1000000000+end.tv_nsec-start.tv_nsec;
} else {
temp.tv_sec = end.tv_sec-start.tv_sec;
temp.tv_nsec = end.tv_nsec-start.tv_nsec;
}
return temp;
}
Now let’s move to some real example:
#include <iostream>
#include <time.h>
using namespace std;
timespec diff(timespec start, timespec end);
int main()
{
timespec time1, time2;
int temp;
clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &time1);
for (int i = 0; i< 242000000; i++)
temp+=temp;
clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &time2);
cout<<diff(time1,time2).tv_sec<<":"<<diff(time1,time2).tv_nsec<<endl;
return 0;
}
timespec diff(timespec start, timespec end)
{
timespec temp;
if ((end.tv_nsec-start.tv_nsec)<0) {
temp.tv_sec = end.tv_sec-start.tv_sec-1;
temp.tv_nsec = 1000000000+end.tv_nsec-start.tv_nsec;
} else {
temp.tv_sec = end.tv_sec-start.tv_sec;
temp.tv_nsec = end.tv_nsec-start.tv_nsec;
}
return temp;
}
To use clock_gettime
you need to include time.h
and to link to librt.a
. If you use gcc
just make sure you add -lrt
to your list of arguments.
Play a bit with the length of the for loop. As you can see clock_gettime
provides much more accurate results and can register very short processing time too. Just remember that as the case with any profiling functions, this function adds a little overhead to your program, so make sure you disable the profiling code, using preprocessor commands for example, in the production release.
26/9/2007 – Update
You may want to take a look at The Revised String Iteration Benchmark post for another, larger, example of using clock_gettime
to time performance of code.
Returning a local variable in diff function? Isn’t that a call for disaster?
Actually not, returning a
struct
is part of the C specification.Hi Guy,
Can you explain more detail as following statement ?
temp.tv_sec = end.tv_sec-start.tv_sec-1;
temp.tv_nsec = 1000000000+end.tv_nsec-start.tv_nsec;
Thanks
It preforms the carry operation of the subtraction.
cout<<diff(time1,time2).tv_sec<<“:”<<diff(time1,time2).tv_nsec<<endl;
may cause problems if the number of nanoseconds is not represented by exactly 9 digits.
%09ld formatting may solve things if the number of nanoseconds is represented by less than 9 digits,
but not in case of more than 9 digits.
Better be safe and use something like
printf(“Elapsed time equals %.4f seconds”, diff(time1,time2).tv_sec + diff(time1,time2).tv_nsec/1e9);
Hey Guy,
Part of the code from your example:
int temp;
for (int i = 0; i< 242000000; i++)
temp+=temp;
has undefined behaviour of using uninitialized variable and signed integer overflow. Plus it can be easily optimized out as a dead code.
Thank you for the post, though!
diff function must be
struct timespec Lib_Utils_diff_time (struct timespec start, struct timespec end)
{
// stuff
}